Entrepreneurship Is The Process Of Opening A New Business

Entrepreneurship is the process of opening a new business; typically the company offers an innovative product, process or service. As per Carton et al, entrepreneurship is all about the identification of an opportunity, creation of new organization, and pursuing new ventures. There are many various studies based on entrepreneurship (directly as well as indirectly) like building and promoting a business, applying creativity to make an existing business more productive, external skills required in entrepreneurs, etc. In 1934, Schumpeter has stated that an entrepreneur not only needs to innovative and creative but also should be able to take risk. His views where then supported by Wickham in 2006. The responsibilities of an entrepreneur†¦show more content†¦As opposed to this a small business owner is the one whose objective is to manage stable growth, sales, and profits for his business. Every business that comes into existence goes through these phases. Pre-inception phase where in the business model is developed, the assets are allocated and the process is defined. It is then followed by the inception phase, which incorporates the analysis of the estimated risks and costs. Then beings the construction phase, where the project plan is prepared and the stakeholders are ready for the system to function. Then comes the production phase, where the production begins commercially. It initiates growth of the firm. In the growth phase of any enterprise, there are lots of challenges with the revenues or profits increasing. The peaking of profits, additional repairs and maintenance charges in the maturity phase then follows. Post this phase, the enterprise moves towards retirement unless it splits into a new business model or is taken over. Many researchers have studied Enterprise growth for decades now. Irrespective of the fact that the enterprises are large or small and public or private, the growth of an enterprise is concerned with the plans of the enterprise to execute fundamental changes. These fundamental changes involves multiple things like modified or new relationships with the markets or / and customers, offering new products or ones differentiated from those already existing in the markets, offering new services

Julius Caesar Rhetoric Analysis - 1228 Words

The play Julius Caesar is deeply rooted in Shakespeare’s characteristic methods of rhetoric and persuasion. This play is primarily driven by the technique of persuasion when Cassius has convinced Brutus that must die. This sets the story in motion; however, the plot ending is determined by Antony’s speech to the people. Shakespeare’s method of rhetoric has been the most powerful usage of words and writing, creating the opportunity to collapse kingdoms and rise anew. Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar scrutinizes the power of rhetoric by rivaling two speeches, Brutus verses Mark Antony. In the end, it is shown that Antony’s rhetoric to be clearly greater as his effect on the people’s receival is supportive. Clearly, Antony does not have the†¦show more content†¦We know what is in store upon the private utterings of Antony â€Å"O, pardon me, thou bleeding piece of earth, That I am meek and gentle with these butchers! (III. ii. 269-270). Brutus’ speech was equally compelling. He uses Pathos creating appeal for the peoples love of Rome â€Å"Romans, country men and lovers†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (III. ii. 12-13). Ethos when calling the people his fellow countrymen, saying he has honor and they have wisdom â€Å"Believe me for mine honor, have respect to mine honor that you shall believe. Censure me in your wisdom†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (III. Ii. 15-17). He declares no crime is committed with the statement â€Å"†¦This is my answer: not that I loved Caesar less-but that I loved Rome more† (III. ii.20-22), this announcement is his example of logos, a crime for the greater good of Rome. Cesar is wise and loving he claims which is unwritten irony as he truly does not mean it. His rhetoric questions are, Who is here so rude that would not be a Roman? (III. ii.31-32). Brutus speech was agreeably received as the people cheered him on. Brutus speech permanently fails to successfully win the people over because he does not appreciate or understand them. Largely his failure starts at the beginning when asking the people to, â€Å"Censure me in your wisdom, and wake your senses† (III. Ii. 17-18). His failure to realize that the people are an angry mob and wisdom is lacking due to the shared anger. His argument is delivered coldly and with calculating reasoning. His argument ofShow MoreRelatedRhetoric and Betrayal in Julius Caeser Play1486 Words   |  6 PagesWilliam Shakespeare’s famous play Julius Caesar utilizes the literary element of rhetoric multiple times throughout to show the true power that words can hold. The rhetoric in Caesar accompanies the play’s themes of betrayal, deception, and exaggeration. Brutus uses rhetoric to persuade the crowd of plebeians that the murdering of Caesar was positive and beneficial to all of Rome, winning their support and causing them to join his cause. Soo n after, Mark Antony gives a terrifically-persuasive speechRead MoreThe Power Of Words : Julius Caesar1218 Words   |  5 PagesThe Power of Words (Major Assignment: Julius Caesar Analysis) Initially, the thought of having at least a dynamic character with some sort of clemency to live from their mistakes would be conspicuous in most analogies, but â€Å"Julius Caesar,† written by William Shakespeare, is no exception. This tragedy took place in an era where mythological divinities were once believed; hence, this play settled across the capital of Rome, Italy. According to Aristotle, tragedy has six main elements: plot, characterRead MoreThe Role of Persuasion in Julius Caesar Essay examples1066 Words   |  5 PagesJulius Caesar Topic: Write an expository essay on the role of persuasion in the play. Julius Caesar is a tragic drama written by William Shakespeare in 1599. This tragedy takes place in ancient Rome around 44 B.C when Rome was a great empire. Julius Caesar was a very important figure at this time as he was a very successful general who helped spread the Roman Empire and after his defeat of his political rival Pompey, he took on the role of becoming a dictator of Rome. But many citizens â€Å"fearedRead MoreRhetorical Analysis of Antonys Speech 3.2842 Words   |  4 PagesRhetorical Analysis of Antony’s Speech In Julius Caesar, Mark Antony is given the opportunity to speak at Caesar’s funeral by the conspirators the murdered him. Through his words, Antony seeks to cause dissent and let mischief reign over his audience, the plebeians of Rome. Antony uses rhetorical questioning to provoke the crowd into a fit of rage over Brutus’ words. Antony disguises his true intents in his speech, putting him at a moral high ground over Brutus. He finally uses ambiguous meaningsRead MoreA Historical Overview Of Julius Caesar Essay1452 Words   |  6 PagesA Historical Overview of Julius Caesar (Shakespeare style) The fate of a nation determined by one man. With classic alliances and betrayals, the tale of Julius Caesar is still regarded as one of the greatest betrayals in human history. The fate of Rome was heading toward a dictatorship. Only the Roman Republic could stop Julius Caesar from ruling Rome. Little did the Roman Republic know that this assassination would later cause Octavian Caesar to become the first Emperor of the Roman Empire in 27Read MoreWilliam Shakespeares Julius Caesar - Mark Antony Proves to Be the Most Skilful Politician in the Play. Do You Agree?1238 Words   |  5 PagesWilliam Shakepeares Julius Caesar Mark Antony proves to be the most skilful politician in the play. Do you agree? Power is the ability to influence the behaviour of others - whether this is achieved with or without resistance, for good or for bad. Some would go as far as to say that all human behaviour is propelled by the want of power. One can conclude, however, that power is inevitable in the human society. It’s natural. William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar, is brimming with humansRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Julius Caesar And Richard II Essay2239 Words   |  9 PagesShakespeare’s Julius Caesar and Richard II are plays of tremendous interest for their political discourse. The commons play a lesser, but no less significant, role in this presentation of competing political and social ideologies. Shakespeare’s treatment of the commoners in both plays is thought provoking in both their similarities and differences. In Richard II they are gifted with intellect, empathy and resolve, while in Julius Caesar they are a fickle collective lacking independence and reas oningRead MoreJulius Caesar by William Shakespeare2100 Words   |  9 Pagesthe play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony is depicted as a better leader than Brutus, due to his cunning use of rhetoric when addressing the plebeians after Caesar’s death. This essay will be divided into two sections to explore the ways in which Antony is depicted as better leader. The First section will contextualise the extracts used for analysis, and compare Brutus’s pedestrian speech with Mark Antony’s impressive oratory. This will be done by defining what rhetoric is, and howRead MoreJulius Caesar Essay1878 Words   |  8 PagesA friend of Caesar. Antony claims allegiance to Brutus and the conspirators after Caesar’s death in order to save his own life. Later, however, when speaking a funeral oration over Caesar’s body, he spectacularly persuades the audience to withdraw its support of Brutus and instead condemn him as a traitor. With tears on his c heeks and Caesar’s will in his hand, Antony engages masterful rhetoric to stir the crowd to revolt against the conspirators. Antony’s desire to exclude Lepidus from the powerRead MoreA Teacher Who Received The Teacher Of The Year Award From Woodbridge High School768 Words   |  4 Pagesand historical writing with Julius Caesar). She selects the instructional materials/techniques from her past experiences, which over the years, has accumulated as a pile of â€Å"bulletproof† methodologies. And by knowing her student diverse level of composition skills, she adjusts the difficulty sets of her linguistics and rhetoric lectures. As for students, several assessment techniques are effective in determining their subject mastery: writing homework, reading analysis, and tests. The teacher uploads

To A Friend Whose Work Has Come free essay sample

To Triumph Essay, Research Paper In the verse form # 8220 ; To a Friend Whose Work Has Come to Triumph # 8221 ; , Anne Sexton alludes to the flight of Icarus and Daedalus and to # 8220 ; To a Friend Whose Work Has Come to Nothing # 8221 ; to convey a message to a friend. I think this verse form was written to reassure a friend that what she did was the right thing. Possibly a father figure of the friend advised her to make something and she defied him, doing herself experience worried that she did the incorrect thing. William Butler Yeats one time wrote a verse form titled # 8220 ; To a Friend Whose Work has Come to Nothing # 8221 ; . It was a verse form believed to be written to reassure a friend that what she ended up making was a baronial thing even though in world she failed her original undertaking. The rubric of Sexton # 8217 ; s verse form is an obvious allusion to Yeats # 8217 ; verse form. We will write a custom essay sample on To A Friend Whose Work Has Come or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Sexton changed # 8220 ; Nothing # 8221 ; to # 8220 ; Triumph # 8221 ; in her rubric. Sexton # 8217 ; s friend must hold been a fellow poet to be able to catch the allusion to Yeats # 8217 ; verse form. I believe she wanted her friend to cognize that what she did was the right thing. Possibly she compared her friend to Yeats # 8217 ; friend. Sexton wrote # 8220 ; Think of the difference it made! # 8221 ; mentioning to Icarus # 8217 ; flight. She might hold wanted her friend to recognize a difference her withstanding her father made. The concluding line of the verse form has a comparably different tone than the first 13 lines. The last line, # 8220 ; See him hailing the Sun and come immersing down while his reasonable dada goes directly into town. # 8221 ; , seems more mocking of Daedalus # 8217 ; flight. It seems that Sexton feels that Daedalus # 8217 ; flight was a otiose opportunity and was in no manner adventuresome. She might besides be comparing her friend to Icarus, seeing as he excessively failed his initial undertaking but accomplished something greater on a planetary graduated table. I believe Sexton thought that Icarus # 8217 ; flight was non foolish or a failure, but adventuresome and a great personal success, even though his satisfaction and personal glorification was ephemeral. She wrote # 8220 ; Admire his wings # 8221 ; , # 8220 ; wonderfully burrowing # 8221 ; , and # 8220 ; Who cares that he fell back to the sea # 8221 ; , therefore I think that she doesn # 8217 ; t believe that the fact Icarus plunged to the sea is of import. Many have used the procedure of allusion in the yesteryear to assist convey a significance of a verse form. A popular illustration and pick of an allusion subject is the bible or past plants of art and literature. Anne Sexton evidently chose allusion as her method of conveying her emotional message to her friend.

Inspector calls, dramatic devices alcohol Essay Example

Inspector calls, dramatic devices alcohol Paper We now start to see similarities in characters actions, Arthur Birling, when in trouble hoped rescue by his status, now we see Eric in trouble, and his true character is under interrogation, he goes to alcohol. This is giving us evidence for their immorality itself being a source of courage. The family becomes disintegrated upon the inspectors interrogation. This truly reflects the relationship between each of them, they are living in such hypocrisy, they are concerned of what the public will think of them, but fail to contemplate on their own actions. This also confirms my point at the start where I said there is no love between them. As we discuss themes in further, we find that certain explanations begin to prove and link points I made earlier, in the start I referred to battle ground of socialist and capitalist systems. Clearly here upon the inspector interrogation, the family become noticeably weak and defenceless, only returning back to there alcohol. Priestley enables us to study these themes, from one device we have opened many areas and have studies quite deeply. We will write a custom essay sample on Inspector calls, dramatic devices alcohol specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Inspector calls, dramatic devices alcohol specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Inspector calls, dramatic devices alcohol specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer I believe that, due to Erics severe corruption, it is possible to study themes, jus through this character, as his alcohol issue and corruption leads to other characters and themes; therefore this also proves the effectiveness of the dramatic device. Erics actions also reflect the failure of his father to teach moral values to his children, as Eric turns out just like his father, where on the outside there are principled people yet there is immorality behind the exterior. I gathered theres a very good chance of knighthood I was lord mayor here when royalty visited Although Arthur Birling head of the household stands superior in society, he truly shows us the corruption that lies in the family and society, where though seen to be principled and respectable people with such a position, they do not match in their morality. Eric always turns to alcohol instead of using moral courage. This is similar in all the male characters apart from the Inspector. Even Gerald is addicted to the drink, as he also reaches out for courage, using alcohol to change the subject. Dyou mind if I give myself a drink, Shelia? Eric is perhaps a result of Arthurs capitalists way of every man for himself, his beliefs integrated into the family made Eric an outcome. Erics hypocrisy in behaviour, example him stealing money, which at the time and context is serious theft, also gives evidence for Birling issue of status, he climbs for status but he puts aside values to achieve this, by this I mean, what Priestley is trying to say is, the status you have is outwardly, he is telling the audience, look what really is behind this person, how can he be given status? Perhaps teaching your children moral values having a good family maybe the best reputation you can have. This is perfect example of capitalist beliefs Priestley is trying to protest, through the dramatic devices he is exploring the true condition of society. Socialists believe looking after everyone, so the country can prosper. Priestley is presenting us with a clear picture of how deeply affected society is, he is showing the problems are all over. This proves how effective the dramatic device is, the actions revolve around alcohol through this we can study the themes of morality, families and responsibility in the play. Priestleys message, is telling us although being capitalists they are in moral bankruptcy which causes the low class people to become the victims of people like the Birlings. Another issue is also tackled, Priestley fights for equality as well in the story, and he shows Sheilas lack of power. Throughout the interrogation we see how Sheila was always ignored by her father. Eva smith is the biggest victim here, a defenceless women controlled by pompous families leading to her tragedy. This also reflects and gives us evidence of the suffragettes which shows us what women were going through at the time. Generally the women were more moral than women, we see that Sheila faces up to the facts, Eric has not developed moral responsibility. (top of page 32) Sheila infact is more conscience than the parents. Sybil is pompous just like her husband; her husband has seemed to have an affect on her morality. This is shown when Sybil rejects Eva smith charity; mainly because she said her name was Birling, demonstrating her smugness and self-importance. Inspector calls. Society needs an inspection, abiding moral laws; the word Goole perhaps connotes a Ghoul to the Birlings. The themes are discussed through Alcohol and we know that The Inspector stays away from Alcohol. Meaning he does not fall under this category, this is not to say he is against drinking, but he is able to control himself, using his morality as a source of courage, unlike the Birlings who go to alcohol. The Inspector seems to be very good at controlling the whole situation. Birling accepts his insistence. The author he is showing contrast in the two enemies, how capitalists mean destruction and how socialist will help the country prosper. Priestley shows It is not only the Birlings, but also the Crofts who are equivalent in there capitalism and lack of morality. Gerald also goes to bars. Telling us that selfish families working together killing the people, which is what they practically did. It shows that both families failed to teach there children moral values. They believe as long as the people dont find out it is okay. Look Inspector Id give thousands (so long as he doesnt tell the public. ) The author clearly explains to us here, the deepness in corruption, a young girls death was no dagger to the heart or no means of remorse, yet again the only thing of importance was their status and image. All the cases above are influenced by Alcohol, e. g. the place bar e. t. c. Priestley is using Alcohol as a physical manifestation of the corruption and hypocrisy of pre-world war society. Through tinted bottles of wine we see the decadence. He is showing, by exploring the different themes of responsibility and status, that society is towards destruction in the hands of the capitalists. The low classes are suffering from this; Priestley also makes political reference, Alderman Meggarty goes to the palace bar, drinks alot He implies that where there is power there is corruption and the capitalist where generally in power. On the account of hearing this Mrs Birling was absolutely staggered by this, Priestley shows how pompous they are as they believe no one has the right to go against them, despite there being clear corruption; this also shows the suffocating hypocrisy they live in. Therefore written in 1946 near WW2, Priestley is saying that society is making the same mistakes as in WW1, the lesson was not learnt on Eva smiths death, and he is warning society. He emphasises, if men will not learn his lesson, they will be taught in Blood, fire and anguish. Society needs change. In conclusion, the dramatic device has produced a specific effect on the audience; it has enabled us to explore the themes in society of morality, class, families and responsibility. The message has been clearly displayed through these uses. From what seemed to be just a detective story it has truly opened to a whole new genre.